> On Aug 9, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Noel Chiappa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Johnny Billquist
>
>> And one should not forget Algol.
>
> IIRC, Algol is mentioned in the paper I linked to. Of course, Algol's DNA is
> in pretty much every procedural language ever created since it was.
Algol 60, that is. It was used as the inspiration by just about everything
that followed, sometimes very clearly and cleanly (Pascal, Modula), sometimes
less so (C). And sometimes a designer created a total botch based on gross
misunderstanding of Algol (Jovial).
Algol 68 is a very different and much more complex language. It didn’t go far
and wasn’t nearly as influential, though Arne Stroustrup mentions its influence
on C++ (and this is pretty obvious when you look at C++ stream I/O).
>
>> From: Andy Holt
>
>> (and, for that matter, PL/1 should probably be considered an unsung
>> inspiration for C as it was the implementation language for Multics
>> in which Bell labs was a partner and must have inspired at least
>> the name for Unix)
>
> The paper also mentions PL/I - IIRC, they (Ken, Dennis et al) had used it on
> Multics, and didn't like it. (Which I can understand!) I'm not sure there are
> any ideas from PL/I (specifically) which influenced C.
PL/I also has the distinction (so to speak) of being the only programming
language in history with a formal description more difficult to understand (by
a large margin, in fact) than the one used in Algol 68.
paul
