> -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brent > Hilpert > Sent: 09 August 2015 19:10 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > Subject: Re: Classic programming > > On 2015-Aug-09, at 10:40 AM, Robert Jarratt wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Paul > >> Koning > >> Sent: 09 August 2015 18:22 > >> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > >> Subject: Re: Classic programming > >> > >>> On Aug 9, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Robert Jarratt > >>> <robert.jarr...@ntlworld.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> ... > >>> I used to like Algol68, and got to play with an implementation > >>> called Algol68C > >> on a DECSYSTEM-20 in the late 70s. Occasionally I ask if anyone has > >> got the media for it, I still live in hope. I think there are some > >> other implementations around, I should make the effort to try one some > time. > >> > >> There was a quite good Algol 68 for the CDC 6000 series. > > > > Maybe I should get one of those then.... :-) > > > >> There are also > >> oddities like an Algol 68 interpreter (not compiler) written in Algol 60. > >> > >> And there is an open source Algol 68 around today - algol68g. > > > > I think that is the one I was thinking of. I should give it a go. > > > There was also AlgolW, supported on MTS. > > As MTS was being mentioned earlier I was going to ask if anyone knew > whether the AlgolW compiler was included in the available distribution.
I believe that its included, but I haven't tried it. Dave G4UGM