On 7/7/17 12:08 PM, Paul Koning wrote:

>> And I'm moving towards flux-level archiving and away from using
>> stock tape transports.
>> But then, I've been saying that for 15+ years now and haven't done it.
> It would be great to have that capability, after the company that had it 
> before seemingly vanished.  Better yet if you can handle not just plain 7 and 
> 9 track 1/2 inch tape but also other formats.  3/4 inch tape would come to 
> mind (DECtape and friends).  There's one inch tape (CDC 626) though I'm not 
> sure if any has been preserved.  There's 1/2 inch 10 track tape 
> (Electrologica X1 and others).
> Stuff like error correction data makes sense for such low level capture.  
> It's not so obvious if you're working with a conventional tape transport, 
> which simply tells you "read error, you're SOL" if the checksums are no good. 

I guess you've tried contacting John then about the Xelctrologica tapes?

He sent me a prototype drive with 18-track (IBM 3480) head that I still haven't
gotten to work. Most of the code lives on a Virtex FPGA board with the A/D 
attached and he never gave me the source or adequate instructions on how to 
talk to it

This only works because the 3480 and 90 still used 1/2" width tape.

DECtape recovery hasn't been a problem. It's pretty rugged stuff.

I'm much less hopeful on any other parallel tape formats, since there are so 
few and the desire
to recover any of that has been low.

Reply via email to