Which part is it that bothers you? That the subject is not changed (which I did) or that the In-Reply-To: header is preserved which mucks up threading in my client.
anyway, this has been up for discussion before with little improvements..so I have given up and accept status quo. /P P.S. sorry if my emulator mail was booring. D.S. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:26:57PM +0100, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote: > I have to say that I hate this email thread abuse so much...! > Is it so difficult to leave the thread about PICTURES (fill in whatever > topic it was about) intact? It would be so much better to start a new > thread instead: > > - Does not disturb original discussion. > - Can be found and identified easily: Do you think that you will find the > <blah blah emulator intersting blah> easily in a few years if it's > discussed under the caption "VCF PNW 2018: Picture!"? > > And on the other hand there are those people who seem to be unable to > create a prober reply to the list and therefore make threads appear > scattered and broken into many many pieces... > > Sorry for ranting, but I enjoyed the pictures and following discussion so > much and now encountering that dumb emulator discussion in this place > annoys me so much...! > And yes, I know that I sent this message as a reply to another message. > > Kind regards > > Philipp > > On 19.02.2018 15:44, geneb via cctalk wrote: > >On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote: > > > >>What do they have up there for Honeywell? Any DPS-8’s? I know they > >>should have at least a box of GCOS-8 manuals (in hindsight, the only > >>manuals I regret sending up there). > > > >Zane, they've got a DPS-8 maintenance/operator/? panel sitting right out > >front. It's fully operational and is connected via some magic hardware > >to a Raspberry Pi running a Multics emulator. The guy that wrote the > >emulator gave a talk that should be the first one you watch once Erik has > >a chance to get the video posted. >