> On Jul 20, 2019, at 8:45 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > On 7/20/19 2:37 PM, Nigel Johnson via cctalk wrote: >> I never could figure out why would anybody need dbase IV when RMS was built >> into the VAX file system? > > Compatibility with other dbase files from other platforms that didn't have > RMS? Or because RMS isn't a database? Even an ISAM file is a very different beast from a database. Come to think of it, you might deduce this from the fact that DEC built database products on VMS, DBMS (a CODASYL database, whatever that means) as well as RDMS (a relational database, built I think when that concept had just appeared). paul
- Re: WordPerfect 5.1+ for VMS Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: WordPerfect 5.1+ for VMS Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- Re: WordPerfect 5.1+ for VMS Zane Healy via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS (was WordPerfect ... Eric Dittman via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS (was WordPerf... Zane Healy via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS (was Word... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS (was ... Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- RE: dBase IV for VAX/VMS ... Dave Wade via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS ... Nigel Johnson via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS ... Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS ... Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS ... Zane Healy via cctalk
- Re: dBase IV for VAX/VMS ... Nigel Johnson via cctalk