On 9/27/19 2:07 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > On 9/27/19 9:22 AM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote: >> On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: >>> I make it a habit to assume that every email which contains just a >>> link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address. >>> >>> Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want >>> people to look at it, you need to say what the link is. >>> >>>> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html >> >> >> "... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their >> non-linear temporalities." >> >> "Repair does not necessarily focus solely on “the reproduction of >> social and material order,” but also opens up space for the >> “creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process >> of fixing, across human and non-human bodies." >> >> "... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of >> repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of >> repair while also recognizing “traditions of women's work, domestic >> and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and >> informal.”" >> >> >> Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in >> watching ridiculous people. > > My reaction also--bunch of word salad devoid of meaningful information > that reads like someone's attempt at a dissertation. > > --Chuck >
This topic has gotten far more words and attention than the poorly written mental spew that pretends to be intellectual. If I were grading their work it would be a D- and a fail is less significant. The scam is eating your time which is worth something with nothing in reward. Lets call it 5 minutes you will never get back. Allison
