On 11/18/19 9:16 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > Would you please clarify if you have the "Local" or "Remote" 3174? All of my terminal controllers are remote, since I don't have anything with a channel. I have a small S36 in storage which is why I have some interest in twinax. I guess I'd have more if anyone ever gets S34 or 36 running in simulation. I have started collecting ISA/PCI/Nubus cards and software for twinax to go along with what I've been doing for coax. They are pretty cheap and available right now (at least the HW, software is harder) with the exception of the Nubus Coax/Twinax board which is unobtanium.
- RE: 3270 controller simulation Dave Wade via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Grant Taylor via cctalk
- RE: 3270 controller simulation Dave Wade via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Al Kossow via cctalk
- RE: 3270 controller simulation Dave Wade via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Grant Taylor via cctalk
- RE: 3270 controller simulation Dave Wade via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Al Kossow via cctalk
- RE: 3270 controller simulation Dave Wade via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Chris Zach via cctalk
- Re: 3270 controller simulation Al Kossow via cctalk
