> On Nov 13, 2022, at 2:31 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> AI, not so clear. In my view, AI is a catch-all term for "software whose >> properties are unknown and probably unknowable". > > Someone recently on Hacker News talked about the possibility of neural net > models to translate code for other architectures. The best response to this > idea described it as a "turbo SIGILL generator." That's a good description. > The mental image of a CPU ramming into a silicon brick wall, reversing and > doing it again, over and over, possibly infinitely (the halting problem) comes > irresistibly to mind. I see all too many "inventions" that can be summarized as "use prior art solution X to well known problem Y by executing X in an AI (or "machine learning") system." Sigh. paul
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? emanuel stiebler via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Tony Duell via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Anders Nelson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Martin Bishop via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Tapley, Mark B. via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Mike Stein via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Glen Slick via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Warner Losh via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Inline Serial Device? Ethan Dicks via cctalk
