> On Mar 17, 2023, at 11:22 AM, Chuck Guzis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anent the Smotherman paper. Woefully incomplete and inaccurate, but > perhaps a starting point. > > https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/interrupts.html I noticed the section on deferred interrupts, which mentions Cutler and "fork" on RSX. It doesn't mention the similar mechanism, also called fork, in RT-11. I don't know if RT-11 was earlier or concurrent, nor whether the two came up with it independently. paul
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Jay Jaeger via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainfram... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainfram... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainfram... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainfram... Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainfram... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainfram... Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainfram... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Found more CAMAC stuf... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini W2HX via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Zane Healy via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Chuck Guzis via cctalk
