Oh, ok. The photos for that terminal clearly show it to be a VT05-B.
paul
> On Dec 22, 2025, at 1:47 PM, Mike Katz via cctalk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> The VT05 was 300 baud the VT05B was 2400 baud.
>
> On 12/22/2025 12:29 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2025, at 3:40 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025, Andrew Back wrote:
>>>> He wants over 4,000 Euro? I have plenty of things that I'd be prepared
>>>> to ship worldwide for that sort of price.
>>> Yeah, totally insane. In know, this terminal is quite rare, but it's just a
>>> dumb slow terminal.
>> "dumb"? Depends on what you mean by that. It is not a "glass TTY"; the
>> VT05 has commands similar to the VT52, and early versions of TECO could do
>> full screen editing on one of those. And while 2400 baud is slow by today's
>> standards, it was blindingly fast for those of us used to ASR33s or even
>> Silent 700s.
>>
>> paul
>>
>>
>
