Yep After sleeping it off, I think the spindle ring was on RP03/Winchester
style packs, Or maybe I'm hallucinate like chatgpt, Pushing 70 and feeling
it. I can't believe I was running up and down stairs at HP just 8 years
ago. Feels like 100.

On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 8:44 AM Jim Davis <[email protected]> wrote:

> I used DEC for years, from straight -8 and  the11/45 at OMSI west lab, to
> Metheus BSD 4.1/4.2, Sys V and RT-11 to the 90's with microvax, Those were
> the days when it actually felt like you helping humanity, making life
> better. Not any more.
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 7:43 AM Nadav Eiron via cctalk <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Nope. Those are different drives. Mine has 2 *physical* RK05 drive IDs
>> for each platter. Look at (PDF) pages 12-13 in this file:
>>
>> http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/plessey/peripheral/Plessey_Minicomputer_Add-Ons_and_Peripherals_ca_1975.pdf
>> I believe you're describing the PM-DD/11B and I have the PM-DD/11C. I have
>> them on a PDP-11/45, so OS/8 isn't part of the equation :)
>>
>> Nadav
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 12:48 AM Christian Corti via cctalk <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2025, Nadav Eiron wrote:
>> > > I have such a drive connected to an 11/45. It's branded as Plessey.
>> The
>> > > drives are double density RK05 compatible (i.e., it's like an RK05F +
>> a
>> > > "removable RK05F" with a specially marked removable pack that looks
>> >
>> > We have a couple of those, all branded as Plessey, but they are Wangco
>> > type F drives. They have one fixed and one removable platter.
>> > It is like two RK05, not RK05F.
>> >
>> > > physically like an RK05 pack) and present as 4 RK05 drives to the
>> > > controller - two on the fixed platter and two on the removable one.
>> > Haven't
>> >
>> > This would be on the PDP-8 / RK8E where each platter is divided into two
>> > parts because OS/8 can't handle as many blocks as one entire platter
>> has.
>> > This makes your 4 logical drives, but it is still only like two RK05
>> > drives.
>> >
>> > Christian
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to