On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Ulrich Wilkens wrote:
> On 09/01/13 01:34, Jon Trulson wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>>
>>> These symlinks got added during the dtinfo work. But OpenBSD does not
>>> use these; it's pretty much a linuxism.
>>>
>>> Actually, using /usr/dt/lib as library directory and then doing an
>>> ldconfig dance in post_install is pretty ugly as well, but the whole
>>> install framework should be replaced anyway, and I don't even use much
>>> of it in my port, so ...
>>>
>>
>> Applied.
>>
>
> I'm afraid the patch wasn't applied correctly. At least I cannot see it
> with 'git log'. Can you also apply the attached patch? It does the same,
> but for the default install.
>
I see it as commit 394e32bd0b523db4b70b1ec794d0f579f967059a .
> I still need the default install on OpenBSD for two reasons:
> The OpenBSD port uses the tarball, but that's not sufficient for development.
> The other reason is that meanwhile I've 14 VMs for testing. This can
> only be handled if the same scripts can be used on all platforms.
>
So, does OpenBSD need the libxxx.so files for development too? Should
that patch not have been applied? (I do not have OpenBSD).
I'll apply your patch.
--
Jon Trulson
"I was not genomed to alter reality."
- Sonmi 451
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
cdesktopenv-devel mailing list
cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
