On 09/05/13 19:21, Jon Trulson wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Ulrich Wilkens wrote: > >> >> I'm afraid the patch wasn't applied correctly. At least I cannot see it >> with 'git log'. Can you also apply the attached patch? It does the same, >> but for the default install. >> > > I see it as commit 394e32bd0b523db4b70b1ec794d0f579f967059a . >
Interesting, this afternoon I got from "git show 394e32...": fatal: bad object 394e32bd0b523db4b70b1ec794d0f579f967059a But now it works. There must have changed something. >> I still need the default install on OpenBSD for two reasons: >> The OpenBSD port uses the tarball, but that's not sufficient for >> development. >> The other reason is that meanwhile I've 14 VMs for testing. This can >> only be handled if the same scripts can be used on all platforms. >> > > So, does OpenBSD need the libxxx.so files for development too? Should > that patch not have been applied? (I do not have OpenBSD). > No, everything is ok with the patch. I just didn't know that OpenBSD doesn't need the so-files (I'm more of a FreeBSD guy). -- Ulrich Wilkens Email: m...@uwilkens.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ cdesktopenv-devel mailing list cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
