On Nov 21, 2007 2:09 PM, Nina Jeliazkova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just had in mind, that using serialization for this purpose is not very > good idea, since the serialized object can change if the definition of e.g. > AtomContainer will be changed in future. > This will result in errors when trying to read old serialized objects with > the new version of AtomContainer. > > Of course if CDK freezes the implementation of core objects this will not > be an issue:)
The API for the data classes in CDK 1.0.x are 100% frozen. For trunk it is in flux. I would likely serialize to CML, though I am not sure CDK-CML-CDK provides a 100% approach without any data loss... Which would make a very nice 3-6 month student project: roundtripping of CDK objects in CML. Egon -- ---- http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
