On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have to say though - if a functionality or package is used by one or two > people, I do not see it as sufficiently vital to the CDK that it be included > in the codebase. Why not push those types of things to a contrib repository? > Or include them as contrib jar files?
Diverging versions at least. But I am worried... we don't know who uses what. We only find out when people publish things, and who of use ever did a proper analysis of which CDK classes are being used in what paper, and in what unpublished work? I think our best guess is where we received bug reports... I think that the research field is mostly interested in small molecules is a biased analysis. Better suggestions? Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
