>From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>> >Your MUA is "broken", "misconfigured" or (User is) "ignorand"
>> 
>> >Your MUA doesn't set the "In-Reply-to" and/or "references"-Headers
>> 
>> >Discussions with more than "a few" Mails (With a high percentage from you)
>> >are absolutly HARD to read because no thread-tree can be build.
>> 
>> I am using the standard UNIX mail program and I see no reason why I should
>> change this.

>You want people to write emails to the gtar Authors to convince them to
>make gtar POSIX-compliant.

If they like me to take gatr for serious: yes!

>Conclusion:

>YOU have to write a complain to the authors of that programm, so that they
>will make it "compliant" to RECENT Email-Standards.

>(Or patch it yourself, implementing this feature should be TRIVIAL)

>Btw. You know that RFC-822 is "deprecated", RFC-2822 is now THE
>Email-Standard. (I don't KNOW it, but i think those headers are defined in
>RFC-2822)

>Conclusion:

>EMail-Programm violating RFC-2822 have to be FIXED.


>Maybe i should fetch RFC-2822 and look if you HAVE TO fix you MUA.

Right, you _should_ read RFC-2822!

If you did, you could have avoided this mail....

>From RFC-2822:

sender          0*              1               MUST occur with multi-
                                                ^^^^^
                                                !!!!!
                                                address from - see 3.6.2

....


message-id      0*              1               SHOULD be present - see
                                                3.6.4

in-reply-to     0*              1               SHOULD occur in some
                                                ^^^^^
                                                !!!!!
                                                replies - see 3.6.4


BTW: RFC-2822 is from  April 2001, so you cannot expect a program that
already follows in less then half a year.

I am quite sure that Solaris 9 (I get the beta in a few months) will 
follow the rules of RFC-2822. There is also a high probability that
even the optional fields are filled in in case there is a common practice
to use them.

J�rg

 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]               (uni)  If you don't have iso-8859-1
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]           (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
 URL:  http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling   ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to