>From: Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>So sprach Joerg Schilling am Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:13:48AM +0200:
>> There is neither of both on UNIX so you should'nt use them.....

>So, the "superior" OS'es like Solaris, HP-UX etc.pp. don't have neither of
>mktemp and tempfile?  What a shame...

What a shame for Linux: You don't need it! 

The main UNIX design goal is not to add useless gicks....

>> UNIX shell scripts are creating tmp files by using a file name=20
>> line /tmp/xxx.$$

>Which works, yes, but you will not get more than 1 tempfile this way, will
>you?


Well UNIX _allows_ you to be creative: use /tmp/xx.$$.someting


>> #!/bin/bash
>>=20
>> in the first line. There is no /bin/bash on UNIX, you should
>> use /bin/sh. I am sure that ther is no need to use bash nonstandard
>> shell extensions in your shell sript.

>Indeed, this should be changed to /bin/sh

And it is nice to see how development done on Linux yields in nonportable
results without reason.

J�rg

 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]               (uni)  If you don't have iso-8859-1
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]           (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
 URL:  http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling   ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to