So sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] am Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 03:45:08PM +0200: > Well you are misinterpreting standards. The standard pager is more and if > a user did not set $PAGER he does not care about the pager he uses. > This is how UNIX always worked. Urgs, if a user does not have PAGER set (which I suspect the most (Linux ?) users don't have set), he expects the standard pager to be invoked. On Linux, the standard pager is less, and *NOT* more. > DONT DO THIS! Why? Because the user might get what he's used to? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 22 hours 16 minutes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Anssi Saari
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Bill Davidsen
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Mike A. Harris
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Bill Davidsen
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar

