So sprach Walter Hofmann am Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:13:56PM +0200: > My mktemp binary actually uses mkstemp(3) instead of mktemp(3). mkstemp > is supposed to be a secure version of mktemp. Uhm, I don't know for sure, but I would suppose so as well. But simply according to the names I said the most "safe" answer without looking at the source - but you're most certainly right. > It does. Your method is insecure, that's the difference. But it's not standard. Uhuh... Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 6 hours 15 minutes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Bill Davidsen
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Bill Davidsen
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Bill Davidsen
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Walter Hofmann
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Joerg Schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Walter Hofmann
- suid root cdrecord? Meelis Roos
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Joerg Schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Joerg Schilling
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Alexander Skwar
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
- Re: CDcontrol software released ( Bill Davidsen