So sprach Walter Hofmann am Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:13:56PM +0200:
> My mktemp binary actually uses mkstemp(3) instead of mktemp(3). mkstemp
> is supposed to be a secure version of mktemp.

Uhm, I don't know for sure, but I would suppose so as well.  But simply
according to the names I said the most "safe" answer without looking at the
source - but you're most certainly right.

> It does. Your method is insecure, that's the difference.

But it's not standard.  Uhuh...

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:       http://www.digitalprojects.com   |   http://www.iso-top.de
   iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
                Uptime: 6 hours 15 minutes


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to