>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 20 18:58:58 2002
>I read the same CD on the same hardware with the same application software
>(your sdd) and I have changed on the use of IDE-CD or IDE-SCSI. I have
>changed only one thing and if you change less than that I can't call it a
>comparison.
>Using the IDE-CD driver the end of data is found, the file written to disk
>is correct. Using IDE-SCSI there is an error trying to read one sector
>beyond end of data, but the file written to disk is identical. Using my
>own program I not no error in either case, but I'm not trying to do some
>fancy queueing of reads to issue one before checking the status of the
>previous. No, I didn't say you were doing that, just that I'm not.
>
>> But if you use the same media for testing, the ATAPI CD-ROM drivers are broken.
>Everything is the same but the driver, what "media" do you think could be
>more "same?"
> sdd if=/dev/scd0 of=ide-scsi.iso bs=100k
> vs.
> sdd if=/dev/hdc of=ide-cd.iso bs=100k
One of both driver _must_ be buggy.
Try readcd dev=xxx f=/dev/null
If it fails for the last sectors, the CD has been written in TAO and the driver
that does not fail is buggy and you should send a bug report to the maintainer.
J�rg
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
