Joerg Schilling wrote: >>From: Manuel Clos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Ok, let's fix it then. > Well a few days did pass and nothing did happen. Why?
I have still no notice from Andreas too. Perhaps he is on vacation or can't get online. > It is interesting to see than Andreas did not even send a single mail. > > Is there no real interest to fix up the problem? I have interest to fix the problem and I hope Andreas has too. > Andreas definitely does know that libedc is _not_ GPL. He has the special > permission to use libedc with cdrdao. > > The fact that he requested and received this special permission makes it clear > that it _cannot_ be GPL. If it was GPLd code then this special permission > is not needed.... > > A major problem with cdrdao is that the fact that cdrdao states that the whole > project is GPLd makes authors of other SW believe that libedc is GPLd too. > > A senseful reaction from Andreas could be to immediately remove all copies that > include the false claims and publish updated versions (e.g. cdrdao-1.1.5a, ...). > In addition, it would be desirable that Andreas contacts all Authors of related > SW that uses libedc and informs them to fix their licenses too. I already told Andreas what is specifically needed (include the COPYING in libedc_ecc, updating the cdrdao COPYING file, ...). I also asked him to do a new release after the fix. No response from him yet. > When will this hapen? I hope it will the soon. -- Manuel Clos [EMAIL PROTECTED] TCPA y Palladium: http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1398 TCPA and Palladium: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
