On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:11:00PM +0100, Alexander Noe' wrote: > Ville Syrj�l� wrote: > > >I wrote: > > > >>4120B flashed to 4160B -> same as genuine 4120B. > >> > >>This suggests that the limitation of the LG 4160B comes from > >>the EEPROM and not from the firmware. > > >That's weird. Does 4120B flashed to 4160B identify itself as 4120B or > >4160B? > > Drives identify themselves always via firmware, not via anything > else. If you flash an LG 4120B to 4160B, it identifies itself as > 4160B, just like an Asus drive identifies itself as Pioneer once > you install a Pioneer firmware.
Ok, thanks. I was just thinking if I should remove the test for 4160B from the patch. But since some people have flashed 4120B to 4160B the patch is probably better with 4160B included. -- Ville Syrj�l� [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
