Joerg Schilling wrote: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You mean that even if there's no buffer underrun the 50 bits or 14 bits > > are always lost in writes around the disk? > > > > Otherwise that could be always left on by default and warn the user when > > the disk write is completed that the disk used burnfree at least once > > and may not be conformant. > > > > Anyway I'd like to know the actual reason to > > turn burnfree of by default > > from Joerg. > > This has been discussed many times, check the archives..... > If burnfree is on, the quality is lower and the first technology > in this area did turn it off by default and the standard says it is > off by default and....
People really care about their CDs working and not having coasters! Joerg Schilling wrote: > Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > According to Jörg, the feature is off by default to ensure continuity > > and compatibility with <whatever I've forgotten and don't care about>. > > If you don't know, why do you answer at all? If you know please say so! For the love of God! > > In my opinion, not a competent reason. > > Not a competent answer.... Why do you care to reply at all? How can you be such an asshole? I think there's a real need to have an upstream source for cdrtools that has all the fixes that Joerg doesn't want to apply even not having a competent reason. Distributions like SUSE, Fedora, RedHat, Ubuntu, Debian, Mandrake have many of the patches that Joerg doesn't want to apply and they are diverging quite a bit. There's a need to create an official upstream source with all these patches included that will remove work for the distribution packagers and would allow other distributions to have a working cdrecord instead the broken one that provides Joerg. Does anyone one know of such an effort to prevent fixes entering cdrecord because of Joerg? Prueba el Nuevo Correo Terra; Seguro, Rápido, Fiable.
