Hi, > I'm not too sure about this one.
I wasn't also sure about this ;-) > You're proposing to change (in src/mingw/pseudo-reloc.c) : > extern char __U(_image_base__); > > But in src/mingw/include/_mingw.h, it says : > #ifdef UNDER_CE > /* ARM Windows CE is not underscored. */ > # define __U(SYM) _ ## SYM > # define __IMP(S) __imp_ ## S > #else > /* Desktop i386 Windows versions are underscored. */ > # define __U(SYM) SYM > # define __IMP(S) _imp__ ## S > #endif > > And in src/binutils/ld/emulparams/arm_wince_pe.sh : > INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR=\"\" > > Vs src/binutils/ld/emulparams/i386pe.sh : > INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR=\"_\" > > Given that the current situation works (see your H3LLO mail), it would > appear best not to touch the binutils stuff for now. Unless you (or > someone else) has reasons to say that this target should behave > differently. > > Depending on whether binutils stays the same, I'd say the > src/mingw/include/_mingw.h file needs to change so the __U macro looks > different. > > Or am I overlooking something ? No, _mingw.h has to change. The check for UNDER_CE is not ok, it has to be a check related to architecture. Can we add an include to get INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR so that we get (not sure if this expands correctly) # define __U(SYM) INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR ## SYM # define __IMP(S) INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR ## _imp_ ## S Else we have to change UNDER_CE to something like this: #if defined UNDERCE && defined __arm__ Johnny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
