On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 19:40 +0200, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> > Depending on whether binutils stays the same, I'd say the
> > src/mingw/include/_mingw.h file needs to change so the __U macro looks
> > different.
> >
> > Or am I overlooking something ?
>
> No, _mingw.h has to change. The check for UNDER_CE is not ok, it has to be a
> check related to architecture. Can we add an include to get
> INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR so that we get (not sure if this expands correctly)
>
> # define __U(SYM) INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR ## SYM
> # define __IMP(S) INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR ## _imp_ ## S
That would require "a bit" of work to hook the binutils build system
into src/mingw. I don't think that this would be a very good idea, this
is too low level stuff.
I've just committed a patch to SVN, can you review ?
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
