On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 15:19 +0200, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> > I have taken up a gcc-trunk copy I took a while ago (two months or so
> > before the gcc-4.4 release) and got it to work.
> >
> > The dynamic version of the libstdc++ DLL works there.
> >
> > See below.
>
> The question is now what todo. We do support GCC 4.4 with ACE/TAO, so
> upgrading to cegcc with gcc 4.4. will not be a big issue for us. Seems a
> decision at the side of cegcc which gcc compiler to support.
I see another question. I've been looking for convincing reasons and
good timing to move beyond the current version of the compiler.
It's clear to me that now is the right time to move away from gcc 4.1.0.
My question is now which version to move to :
a) gcc 4.4 is less than a month old, seems like a good candidate
b) a newer snapshot of gcc-trunk (something between 4.4 and 4.5) if
there are good reasons for it
c) the gcc-trunk snapshot that I have sitting on my disk right now (svn
revision 145210, 2009-03-28).
I think this is a choice we make now, and which we live with for a year
or so.
Pedro and the two Vincents had interest in the past.
Opinions, anyone ?
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
for externally facing server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
