Hi, > > The question is now what todo. We do support GCC 4.4 with ACE/TAO, so > > upgrading to cegcc with gcc 4.4. will not be a big issue for us. > Seems a > > decision at the side of cegcc which gcc compiler to support. > > I see another question. I've been looking for convincing reasons and > good timing to move beyond the current version of the compiler. > It's clear to me that now is the right time to move away from gcc > 4.1.0. > > My question is now which version to move to : > a) gcc 4.4 is less than a month old, seems like a good candidate > b) a newer snapshot of gcc-trunk (something between 4.4 and 4.5) if > there are good reasons for it > c) the gcc-trunk snapshot that I have sitting on my disk right now (svn > revision 145210, 2009-03-28). > > I think this is a choice we make now, and which we live with for a year > or so. > > Pedro and the two Vincents had interest in the past. > > Opinions, anyone ?
I would vote for option (a) Johnny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
