Hi All, On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jorge SM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all :), > > 2013/9/20 Alexander Broekhuis <[email protected]> > >> Hi Celix folks, >> >> Just a question regarding this code. It is a fairly big addition, is this >> patch good enough? Or is a code grand more in place? >> >
Good point, I though we didn't need a grant based on the mail discussion in [1]. But reading it again; I see a ICLA is not needed, but because the code is developed @ Thales a software grant is probably needed? Maybe one of the mentors answer this? For info, technically is it not a problem to get a software grant for this patch. We already did this for the device access donation. [1] http://markmail.org/message/slbnxokeht5maymt > > >> >> I am fine with this patch, but maybe from a license/tracking point of view >> something else is needed.. >> > > About license, I'm very lost, if there is something that needs to come from > me, please let me know, I'd be pleased to help :) > > >> >> If this is ok as it is now, I will add the code to the repo. Reading the >> issue, it is not finished, but I don't see that as a big problem. > > > Yes, the code is not finished, but the implemented parts behave as SPECs > says, if someone needs some specific info of the work, the description of > the issue [1] gives an insight, but if anyone is eager to know more, please > ask. > > >> It won't >> break any of the existing functionality and the config admin is a nice >> addition to what we already have. > > > Friendly greetings, > Jorge SANCHEZ > >
