Hi Jorge,
> > As reporter of the ticket in Jira what I could say is that as starting the > code it's good enough and Pepijn has offered himself to review it. > > My concern isn't with the code, but more with the procedure to follow. As Pepijn already mentioned, for larger parts of code a grant is often used. > > > > > I am fine with this patch, but maybe from a license/tracking point of > view > > something else is needed.. > > > > About license, I'm very lost, if there is something that needs to come from > me, please let me know, I'd be pleased to help :) > Basically it has to do with what you are contributing. In this case it is a completely new bundle, and not as much a bugfix/patch for existing code. So from a license point of view it probably makes more sense to offer this code with a grant instead of only the current sources. But lets wait for one of our mentors (or other ipmc followers on this list) to reply and help us out. > > Yes, the code is not finished, but the implemented parts behave as SPECs > says, if someone needs some specific info of the work, the description of > the issue [1] gives an insight, but if anyone is eager to know more, please > ask. > Will do, don't worry ;). -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis
