so essentially establishing a project management team that can provide focus and coordination within the CellML project? They would lay out some definite goals and direction, and maybe provide a broad idea on how to achieve them but leave the details open to community discussion?
is that what you are thinking, or have I completely missed the point? and maybe we could either continue this discussion only through the cellml-discussion list or drop it out, cause at least for me the messages need the moderators approval to go through due to the number of recipients. Quoting Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maybe it might push an agenda; currently there isn't one. It's a bit > ad-hoc at the moment. I can't imagine them being anything more than > monthly. It's also difficult to tell if they would inspire more > discussion or not without trying it. They may be a complete failure. > > On 10/27/06, David Nickerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > Just wondering how you'd see such conference call meetings improving > > community involvement over the current situation of the project being > > managed in Auckland with discussion of relevant issues on the > > cellml-discussion mailing list? > > > > > > Andre. > > -- David Nickerson, PhD Research Fellow Division of Bioengineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
