Hi All, Maybe we aim for one every 2 months at the moment. What's probably useful is for people to email me or the list with items they would like to bring up in a conference call discussion.
Maybe the first one should be kept to something short - like an hour. Then from there we can see what we think should happen. I'd like to have more visible project plans on the CellML site. My experiences with SBML and Biopax seem to suggest to me that we can work out a simple system that is transparent and works for everyone. What are the time zones we are dealing with? I realize at least some of us will be at opposite ends of the day; I just want to make sure we don't end up with mid-nighters. It's potentially the thing that will make large conference calls difficult. We could also try ones that are focused around particular projects if that seems better. Depends what sort of agendas we come up with. cheers Matt On 10/30/06, Nigel Lovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear All, > > Thanks for also CCing us in Sydney. We would certainly be happy to > contribute to a conference call once every two months. We have been > continuing to develop tools for parameter optmisation of CellML models of > excitable tissue and would value feedback and comments. As always we are > happy to contribute to the wider agenda as well. > > We tend to use Skype for our research collaborations - cheaper for us than > conference calls. > > Regards, > Nigel. > > At 06:29 PM 30/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Dear All, > > > >Thank you for including me too on this. > >I have very similar views to Steve on this. It'd feel very nice to be more > >involved in that way. My main worry is timing as I only have limited > >availability. > > > >Best Regards, Penny > > > >Steve McKeever wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > This is a *very* interesting debate, thanks for including me in on it. > > > Personally I would be happy for there to be a conference call every two > > > months. This would allow us all to hear what you guys in Auckland have > > > been up to and for us to pipe in with our various bits and pieces. I > > > don't think we need more contact and conference calls are a bit hit and > > > miss in terms of people all talking at the same time (or not at all) but > > > once established we could change the frequency or allow for an important > > > session when the need arises. > > > Warm regards, > > > Steve > > > > > > > > >-- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > | Prof Nigel Lovell > | Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, > | Adjunct Professor, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, > | University of New South Wales > | UNSW Sydney NSW 2052 Australia > | Ph: +61-2-93853922 FAX: +61-2-96632108 > | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
