Hi all, Just a minor comment on the glyph definition in the CellML Graph Metadata specification.
The specification currently defines four glyphs: cg:dots, cg:squares, cg:circles, and cg:diamonds. I'd like to suggest that the glyph itself should not be plural. So the four should be: cg:dot, cg:square, cg:circle, and cg:diamond. This default set doesn't include one of the most commonly used (in my experience at least) glyphs, a simple cross (x). So I would like to suggest the addition of cg:cross to the list of glyphs defined by the metadata specification. And given I'm not a big fan of square or diamond glyphs, I'd also like to add cg:plus (+) and cg:triangle, and maybe a cg:asterisk (*) to ensure a suitable range of glyphs are available. I guess a line has to be drawn somewhere as to what to include, but we want to ensure a sufficiently rich set of glyphs...guess it depends on people's interpretation of rich :) David. -- David Nickerson, PhD Research Fellow Division of Bioengineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
