Hi all, Currently the graphing metadata specification provides the basis for drawing two-dimensional line or scatter plots of data defined through simulations performed using CellML models. To distinguish multiple traces on a graph, each trace can be assigned a colour and for scatter plots a glyph.
In terms of a graphical user interface the current specification probably provides enough information for useful plots to be drawn and other clues/hints can be given in the interface to aid the user in understanding the graph. In terms of model publication, I think the current specification lacks some information that is required for the complete specification of a graph suitable, for example, for use in a journal article describing the model. Also for model curation purposes it might be useful to have some more information about the graph. So with the view of using metadata to sufficiently describe a graph that could be used in a journal article, I am after opinions on whether the current graph metadata specification should be further developed to include more optional information or whether something like this belongs in a separate specification that builds on top of the current graphing metadata specification? The former would seem more preferable to me. Thanks, David. -- David Nickerson, PhD Research Fellow Division of Bioengineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
