> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Nickerson > Sent: 10 November 2006 06:40 > To: For those interested in contributing to the development of CellML. > Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Quick questions about units... > > >>>> I'm really not sure how to address this other than > suggesting that > >>>> applications clearly state their units support status > and provide > >>>> some way to easily locate (and view?) instances where unit > >> conversion > >>>> factors have been added to the model (either at the > >> connection level > >>>> or within equations). > >>> To make it simpler in terms of user interface, I think it > should be > >>> done at the connection level. At least, that's where we > >> intend to do it in COR. > >> > >> except that most of the generated units conversion factors could > >> easily be buried inside equations where they are hard to spot with > >> the naked eye...for example, this sort of equation can give you > >> widely different results without the need for any units > corrections > >> at the connection level: > >> > >> a [mM] = b [uM] + c [mM] > >> > >> but would presumably result in (b*0.001) within the equation... > > > > Ok, maybe I misunderstood what you meant by units correction at the > > connection level then. I, personally, intend to do 'b*0.001' when > > computing the model, but not show/tell it to the user when > s/he edits > > the model, so that s/he doesn't get confused. > > yep - thats the sort of behaviour I would expect, but its > also the sort of behaviour that will be very application > specific and provide unwary users of CellML models with > inexplicably different results for the same model in > different applications. Which I'm guessing is why you suggest > this sort of behaviour needs to be enforced in all CellML > compliant applications...
Thanks for your help. I think I have managed to get my point across now... :) Alan. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion