Hi Tommy, That looks good - its all starting to make sense to me now.
I'm just wondering how your system would handle a case where two authors independently encode the same published model. The first author to upload their encoding would get "ownership" of the publication alias (if I have the terminology right). Is there any way for the second author to get a similar alias to their encoding of the model? This is starting to sound like a version/variant theme, but its probably a situation that will crop up quite frequently... This is a slightly different example from your example workflow and could be viewed as John and Mary both having "valid and correct" but different encodings of the doe_2007_1 paper. Actually, I just saw the '_1' on the publication link - is that some kind of version/variant that would be _2 for Mary in my example? I had been assuming the 2007_1 meant January 2007. Thanks, Andre. Tommy Yu wrote: > Hi, > > I thought Andrew's ideas here is worth expanding, and I wrote a page based on > that. > > http://www.cellml.org/Members/tommy/BaseRepository > > Cheers, > Tommy. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
