Hi all Another option to add to the mix: using a Wiki. In this case, I would specifically suggest MediaWiki (a la Wikipedia). Pros: -Widely used, lots of user familiarity. -Easy collaboration: edits done via web interface. -Built in diffs and revision history. -Linking when done via web interface works well. -Can be rendered as PDF on demand (haven't tested this myself, but docs say it can be done).
Cons: -Requires setup and maintenance of another content management system. Unsure: -Usually Mathml handled with LaTex substrings, not sure how to handle MathML in MediaWiki. Regards, Randall > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-discussion- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Garny > Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 9:46 p.m. > To: 'CellML Discussion List' > Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the > CellML Specification > > I don't know much (if anything!) about the solutions offered here, but: > > - the current HTML version is nice for viewing from a web browser, but > if > you have ever tried to print things out you will no doubt have noticed > that > it doesn't look great anymore. I remember that there used to be a > 'proper' > PDF version of the specifications. I really wish we still had something > like > that. > > - Besides the obvious (i.e. easy to use, easy to maintain, well- > established > technology, etc.), I am not too fussed about the solution we go for, as > long > as it is suitable for the end user (e.g. looks nice both on and off the > web > site). > > This being all said, and based on Andrew's pros/cons, I would > personally > vote for DocBook. > > Alan. > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > cellml-discussion@cellml.org > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
