David Nickerson wrote: > Andrew Miller wrote: > >> ... >> How about CellML Infoset, CellML Model, and Mathematical Model? >> > > That sounds good to me. While I guess this use of infoset is pretty > common in the XML world, it might be useful to refer to the CellML XML > Infoset? Or is it safe to assume that people reading the specification > have some familiarity with XML concepts? > I am not sure that having the words XML aid interpretation. Also, there has been some work to create alternative, non-XML serialisations of the infoset - see Fast Infoset for example, which is on an ITU-T standardisation track. We are not talking specifically about the XML serialisation in the places where XML Infoset is mentioned (although of course XML serialisation is the standard for CellML, anything else would be an extension). However, given that the definition of CellML Infoset would reference the XML Information Sets specification, I am not sure that we really need to repeat XML everywhere.
Best regards, Andrew > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion > _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
