Andrew Miller wrote: > David Nickerson wrote: >> Andrew Miller wrote: >> >>> ... >>> How about CellML Infoset, CellML Model, and Mathematical Model? >>> >> That sounds good to me. While I guess this use of infoset is pretty >> common in the XML world, it might be useful to refer to the CellML XML >> Infoset? Or is it safe to assume that people reading the specification >> have some familiarity with XML concepts? >> > I am not sure that having the words XML aid interpretation. Also, there > has been some work to create alternative, non-XML serialisations of the > infoset - see Fast Infoset for example, which is on an ITU-T > standardisation track. We are not talking specifically about the XML > serialisation in the places where XML Infoset is mentioned (although of > course XML serialisation is the standard for CellML, anything else would > be an extension). However, given that the definition of CellML Infoset > would reference the XML Information Sets specification, I am not sure > that we really need to repeat XML everywhere.
OK - makes sense to me. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
