Agreed, that wouldn't harm. Alan
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cellml-discussion- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of James Lawson > Sent: 19 March 2009 14:35 > To: CellML Discussion List > Subject: [cellml-discussion] cellml namespaces > > Hi all, > > I've been snooping around the website and I noticed that if you actually > go to the links for our current live namespaces, you don't find anything > particularly interesting. > > See: > > http://www.cellml.org/cellml/1.0/ > http://www.cellml.org/cellml/1.1/ > http://www.cellml.org/metadata/1.0/ > > The page for all these links currently says: > > "This is the target for the CellML 1.0 namespace prefix. Currently there > is nothing useful here. As the specification is developed, documentation > on each of the elements and attributes in the CellML namespace will be > added. > > In the meantime, why not have a poke around the CellML website at > > http://www.cellml.org/. > > Note that a namespace URI provides a unique identifier for a particular > dictionary of CellML elements. It need not link to a schema or DTD." > > Given that the meantime has now been a number of years, I propose that we > put something more useful up at these URLs. > > What do people think? > > Kind regards, > James _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
