I think what Alan might be getting at, and something that I am also concerned with, is that rather than letting the "solver do its job", we are going down the route of replacing the well tested and supported IDA initial condition solver with something that is perhaps better suited to the types of models generally expressed in CellML. It would be good to see the data which supports the decision to go down this route as well as ensuring that CCGS and CIS can be used with the default IDA initial condition solver if the user so chooses.
Cheers, Andre. On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Randall Britten <r.brit...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > From what I understand, this is exactly what Andrew is setting up. > > Regards, > Randall > > On 26/04/2010, at 8:17 PM, "Alan Garny" <alan.ga...@dpag.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Then, the approach that I would personally take (and the one that I people >> take when solving ODE models, though I accept things might be different >> with >> DAE models!) is to start from the original ICs and let the solver do its >> job. Now, I imagine there might be cases where user changes to some of the >> parameters are such that the original ICs might not be suitable at all? _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
