On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:That's what this page was for, really: http://wiki.centos.org/ContributeWould this sort of a testing effort be better handled under the ageis of the QA Effort rather than the Contribute page ? Most people who use CentOS and want to contribute dont have RHN access or wish to consider RHN access ( opinion based purely on conversations with people at Expo's, shows and emails ).
Well the Contribute page should list all different kinds of way to contribute and QA is one of them. Whether encouraging people to test out RHEL falls under the QA SIG is debatable.
Reported problems go directly upstream. We may want to keep track of reported problems, and maybe tested hardware. It could be organised as the current QA is organised if we have resources to manage it.
Maybe we should ask the QA SIG if they are interested to have this happen under their hood or not. In my opinion this is way to soon to organize.
-- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
