Always Learning wrote: > 3. Therefore, contrary to your assertion > > " Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any > " would be enemy/competitor. Think about it." > > Red Hat must always consider how to "undermine any would be > enemy/competitor" because, ultimately, Red Hat's own survival depends on > exactly that type of action. No profits = No Red Hat. > > > Hey, you are on my side. You should be replying to Chan, not me :-D
you: sorry me: it's ok, no harm done (just to save few mails ;-) ) Ljubomir _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
