Ernie :
What forever vexes me is why the point isn't intuitively obvious that
love, for all of its great importance and necessity in life, isn't  seen
as part of the crux of faith rather than as equivalent to  faith.
 
Indeed, I Corinthians 13 distinguished between faith,  hope,  and  love.
There are additional distinctions to be made.
 
Love conquers all ?  Not really, again, not to minimize its importance  in 
any way.
But it isn't the last word, more like the first word. Maybe  the  central 
word, but
not the only word,  by any means.
 
To say the same thing, who is a better warrior, a Marine or a member of  the
Pope's Swiss Guards ?  Or for a really dramatic contrast,  Mother  Theresa
or Richard the Lion Hearted ?
 
The Marines, as I understand them, simply do not train with language  like
"love your enemies and always show them you care about their immortal  
soul."
Rather, the rubric is "kill, kill, kill."
 
Marines are also trained to respect their enemies where respect is  due,
but this may not be generally even if it applies to an enemy's fighting  
skills.
 
In other words, if one fights, then is there any substitute for
fighting to win ?   If fighting to win is a Good Value,   then consciousness
of some sort of  love imperative while in the midst of combat can  well
become self defeating. And disable defense of those you love.
 
Yes, I am aware of the Sermon on the Mount, etc. But what IS that sermon  ?
Is it 100 % the actual words of Jesus ?  Or is it, as various scholars  
have concluded,
a compendium of Jesus' statements blended with verses that
had their origins with   early mystics of Christian persuasion ?
 
I take the latter view. --to the effect that any statement in the  Sermon
that fails tests of logical good sense, or of uncommon but still good  
sense, 
cannot be the words of Jesus.
 
This being the case, the argument for Christian pietism, despite its  place
in our shared history, is based on false premises.
 
This means a philosophical imperative to rethink the roots of faith.
Those  roots must, for many reasons,  remain Christian, but  cannot  
--again,
at least  as I see it-- be traditionalist in character, and cannot be  
pietist either.
That is, my interpretation of the "heart ". of Christian faith is  congruent
with Buddhist values.  Love  -compassion-- is still  essential.
But objectivity is central.to everything else.
 
 
Billy
 
--------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 4/9/2009 10:56:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Hi  Billy,

On Apr 9, 2009, at 10:14 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Here  is where the battles are being fought. And here is where the  
>  article,
> as thoughtful and thought-provoking as it is, is fatally  flawed. For  
> it is written
> by a professing Christian  with a fairly conventional Christian  
> perspective,  namely,
> that when all is said, love can solve all  problems.
>
> Love can solve many problems, and without it we all  are worse off.  
> But is it
> a universal solvent ?   Not hardly. It is irrelevant in many  
> contexts, for one  thing
> ( science, competitive activities of various kinds, the military  )  
> and it ignores
> the legitimate place of strong  aversion ( "hate" )  in some  
> contexts, viz,
> we are  told to hate sin.
>
> What is most objectionable about the  article, however, is a huge  
> void. There is
> no mention  of our need for an ideology, as it were, of fighting.
>

As usual,  I disagree. :-)  To my mind, we fight *because* we love.  In   
fact, we hate precisely those things that threaten what we love!

In  particular, I think this completely misses the point:

>  It is  irrelevant in many contexts, for one thing
> ( science,
animated by  love of truth, and love of knowledge

> competitive activities of  various kinds
driven by a love of winning, and of being the  best

> , the military )

nurture by love of your country, your  cause, and your fellow soldiers

I agree that love isn't the *only*  solution. However, I believe it is  
*foundational* for understanding  everything else.

Where we truly differ, I suspect, is that I believe it  is possible to  
fight, do violence, and even kill out of love,  without needing to  
actually hate my enemy.

-- Ernie  P.


_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/




_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to