Chris:
I sincerely hope you are right. I am sticking to my  previous
"wait and see" position, regardless. So far, yes the words ( mostly )
sound good. And, yes, this is less than 1/2 year of the new admin.
But all, is not well , therefore I can't be as optimistic as I'd like to  be
So far, while the jury hasn't even gone to its chambers let alone anything
else,
nonetheless  the adage applies, the "jury is still out."

Billy

-------------------------------------------------------



In a message dated 6/7/2009 7:03:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:


Billy,
I agree with your analysis and insight  but I am more optimistic.  I think
that there is a good chance that the  sins of omission you addressed will
eventually appear as action issues, and I  am still hopeful.
And thanks for the tidbit about the  shores of Tripoli.
Chris


____________________________________

From:  [email protected]  [mailto:centr
[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:55  PM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RC] Obama in  Egypt


David:

So  far, government by poetry.

It  all sounds good, but where's the substance  ?



Then  there are all those sins of omission.



Christians  in the Mid East don't merit even a mention, let  alone

serious  consideration for their ( besieged )  position.



Hindus  don't count, which is pointed out since, except for Iraq in
2004-2007,

there  have been more Muslim terrorist attacks against Hindus in India /
Kashmir

than  all other terrorist incidents combined, year after year, since  the
late  1940s.



Lebanon doesn't seem to  count, either, nor Sudan.



Lotsa  talk about democracy but who does Hussein visit FIRST ?
Why the Saudis, of  course, a fascistic monarchy.



Etc,  etc, plus playing games with history.



OK.  sure, Jefferson did what he could to  establish normal relations

with  some Muslim states, but much of that was in reaction to the

Barbary pirates who were  capturing US ships and imprisoning

American  citizens, hence the need to go to war, albeit small scale,

but  not so small that it didn't require the founding of the  Marine Corps

(  form the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli ).



The  poetry does sound nice, but , for one, I am getting  rather

impatient  about lack of realistic policy. I think you nailed  it.

Realism  ?  What's that ?  What,  me worry  ?



Well,  its still too soon to have a decent feeling of  certainty

about  the new admin, but to date I am less and less  hopeful.



Billy



===========================================

































In  a message dated 6/7/2009 2:26:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:

Actually,  the lack of religious tolerance by Muslims makes me feel the
opposite of  hopeful. In the Koran, Jews and infidels basically deserve death
for  existing. Makes one wonder why Allah bothered to create them. It is OK
for  an Islamic believer to lie to Jews and Infidels according to the Koran;
therefore, who says that we can trust anyone in the religion?

So,  good speech, hopeful speech. Realistic? Not quite as much.

David

“There  is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the
means of  achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by
force,  socialism - by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and
 suicide.”--Ayn  Rand



Chris Hahn  wrote:
Thanks Billy.  I  appreciate your analysis.  It makes me feel somewhat
hopeful.  I  agree, we will wait and see what happens.
Chris


____________________________________

From: [email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected])   
[_mailto:[email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected]) ]  On Behalf Of [email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected])
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 8:13  PM
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])
Subject: [RC] Obama in  Egypt

Chris  :

Sorry  not to reply sooner but I was in the midst of preparing a  lecture

for the  U of O. Nothing to do with Islam, it was about the  pathology

of  homosexuality, etc. Just concluded a couple of hours ago. Went  well

despite  some disagreements from homosexuals in  attendance.



I  was thinking, though,  as I worked on the lecture, that this would  have

been  a better week to have given a talk about   Islam.



I  studied parts of the speech especially. But not in the kind of depth 
that is

possible  for me, since I simply didn't have the time. But two things stood
out

and  deserve at least some comment.



Obama  insisted on freedom of choice in religion. Well, OK, an excellent
thing

to  say. But does he understand the implications ?  For is he actually
means what he said,

then  can we look forward to churches in Saudi  Arabia and new synagogues
in  Yemen  ?

That  is, I completely agree with the sentiment but allow me to be
skeptical  about

the  reality of this anytime soon. Why ? Simply because there has never
been  a

majority  Muslim state that allowed freedom of religion    -EVER.



The  other issue to comment on ( several  merit discussion but maybe later
)

is  women's rights . Again, I could not agree more with the sentiment, but
as for

realism,  uhhhh, doesn't Obama understand the obvious ?  He is asking  for

major  revision  to the Qur'an. With the dust settling I expect any  number
of

Muslim  high mucky-mucks to criticize the speech on this point,  strongly,

since  it is so contrary to all traditional schools of Qur'an
interpretation.



Lastly,  what did he say of substance about Israel  and the Palestinians ?

Substance.  His remarks were a sort of gesture, good cop, bad cop in  style,

but  utterly devoid of any kind of concrete program of  action.



The  long and short of it, I agreed with , say, 5 points out of seven,

but  must ( must ) take a wait-and-see approach since, so  far,

it  is rhetoric and nothing else. Hopefully the 5 good points will

prove  to be more than well intentioned  sentiments, but I can  only

guess  if Obama desires to actually do anything real.



Billy



















____________________________________




_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected])
_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com)
Archives at
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/)


_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/






_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/



_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to