How about Mitch Daniels. Seems like a winner...
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2008/12/09/mitch-daniels-for-president-in-2012.html
Not too well know, it appears, looking at the polls. Maybe his
seemingly solid record as a Governor will create confidence in the
electorate if the message gets out.
// Lennart
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:24 PM, David R. Block
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, the blogfather, Glenn Reynolds, has posted a series of polls, the
> summary of which is here:
>
> http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/85846/
>
> His view is that Palin is still viable, but that Huckabee is toast. Huckabee
> even polls below Reynolds' home state Junior Senator Bob Corker. Now how
> many people have heard of Corker compared to how many who have heard of the
> Huckster? And Huck is below HIM? That's BAD for the Huckabee camp.
>
> Jindal looks decent, and even Rick Perry is looking better (nobody would
> have thought that 4 years ago, not even in Texas). If he were interested,
> Tom Coburn would be a good choice.
>
> David
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
