Centroids :
Here is a quote from the last part of the article that follows. 
It concerns  Chicago's loss of the games--
" The stunning rebuke delivered to this most internationally popular 
of presidents is a teachable moment. "
 
What I wonder, first, is what kind of post mortem is the WH doing
in an effort to learn valuable lessons from the outcome ?  And will  the
admin share any of those lessons with the rest of us ?
 
But there is another observation to make, something that the debacle
in Denmark evokes involuntarily.
 
You know, although he has been in office for about 9 months now, 
I can't think of a single thing Obama has done that makes me want to  say,
"Maybe I disagree with him about this or that, but when he did X,  well,
I've gotta tell you, he made me proud to be an American, he is  someone
I can respect whole heartedly."
 
There just isn't anything like that, nothing whatsoever.
 
Sure, a few of the measures he has signed into law are OK, or even  good
on their merits, but all such actions have been pretty much what anyone  
would expect.
Politics-as-usual stuff.  Some of his measures I have disagreed with,  some 
not,
but in any case, nothing at all that has been inspirational, important in  
any larger sense,
or memorable.
 
So far, its all style and little substance. Puffery, if you will, and much  
poetic rhetoric.
While it is a relief not to have to listen to George W's inevitable gaffes  
and malapropisms,
I'm still looking for achievement that matters. Or at least for a decision  
that I can
take pride in as an American. So far, zilch, nada, nothing.
 
Anyone else have a similar view of things ?
 
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 



 
 
Obama wins popularity contests, 
not much else
By JAMES KIRCHICK 
Last Updated: 8:16 AM, October 4, 2009 
Posted: 12:25 AM, October 4, 2009 
 
President Obama is following the advice of that great philosopher  Woody 
Allen, who once said that “eighty percent of success is showing up.” In  
health care legislation, foreign relations and, now, the Olympics, Obama  
believes his very presence is enough to bend the world to his whim.  
But even Allen allowed for 20% of something else. I’m guessing good ideas 
and  effort. 
The decision by the International Olympic Committee must have particularly  
stung. On behalf of his hometown of Chicago, which had invested $50 million 
in  its bid, Obama traveled halfway around the world to swoon IOC officials 
in  Copenhagen. 
With his wife, Michelle, in tow, Obama beseeched the scandal-ridden Olympic 
 bureaucracy, the first time ever that an American president had met 
personally  with the body. 
Facing a 26-year-high unemployment rate of 9.8% here at home, the White 
House  ought to have done some homework before sending the president off on one 
knee,  putting not only his personal reputation on the line, but the 
prestige of his  nation. Yet when voting time came, the entreaties of the 
president who has been  widely lauded for “restoring the moral stature” of a 
country
’s whose reputation  was supposedly tarnished by the policies of his “
unilateralist” and “bullying”  predecessor fell on deaf ears. The Windy City 
finished dead last, eliminated in  the first round. A further indignity: the 
president was still aboard Air Force  One flying back home when he received 
the bad news. Chalk this up as yet another  instance of the administration’s 
elementary incompetence. 
Anita DeFrantz, an American IOC member, was astonished that the grace  
embodied by the first couple wasn’t enough to win over the Olympic bureaucracy. 
 
“I hate the fact that these elegant people were here and then our country 
got  treated that way,” she complained. The “elegance” of Obama was 
supposedly one of  his most bankable traits. Yet so far, Obama’s high global 
approval ratings,  while satisfying for his ego, have yet to redound to the 
nation’
s benefit. 
That the president’s personal popularity and persuasive capabilities will  
work wonders in solving the world’s problems is a conceit fundamental to 
this  administration’s strategic calculus. Yet the Olympics debacle is just the 
latest  casualty of the president’s hubris. Despite their love of Obama, 
our European  allies have yet to step up to the plate in Afghanistan, where 
the very success  of the mission now hangs in the balance. 
The Russians are still occupying parts of Georgia, and neither they nor the 
 Chinese have proven particularly helpful in leveling sanctions on Iran, 
whose  leaders have also proven impervious to Obama’s charisma. 
Nor have Obama’s personal approval ratings translated into domestic policy  
accomplishments. Nine months into his stewardship, the only success to 
which  Obama can point is the stimulus bill. Cap-and-trade is unlikely to pass 
in the  form that the president’s supporters desire, and his health care 
package still  hangs in the balance, despite appearances on all five Sunday 
talk 
shows last  month, an interview with David Letterman, and a nationally 
televised prime-time  address. Obama’s personal approval ratings significantly 
outstrip support for  his proposals, demonstrating that, contrary to the 
presumptuous claims of Jimmy  Carter, it is possible to harbor positive 
feelings 
toward the president yet  still have honest disagreements with his 
policies. We need a leader, not a prom  king. 
The Copenhagen debacle came on the heels of the groveling spectacle that 
was  Obama’s speech to the United Nations General Assembly. 
Before the world’s largest collection of mass murderers and tyrants, Obama  
continued the apology tour he commenced after assuming office, repeating 
his  Cairo mantra that “no world order that elevates one nation or group of 
people  over another will succeed,” among other contrite platitudes. In the  
rough-and-tumble of foreign affairs, as in life, people don’t respect those 
who  don’t respect themselves, and the world has responded resoundingly to 
our  post-national president’s periodic penitence. 
Obama’s efforts — mostly intentional — are to make the US look small,  
unthreatening, humble. That may make us more popular, but the IOC’s rejection 
of  Obama’s personal appeals was yet another indication that there are far 
more  significant metrics of global influence than being liked. I would rather 
the  United States be respected than liked. 
The stunning rebuke delivered to this most internationally popular of  
presidents is a teachable moment. 
If Barack Obama’s suave, “citizen of the world” charm can’t even get us  
beyond the first round of an international sporting competition, what does 
that  say about his ability to garner support for solving far more serious 
and  intractable problems? 
James Kirchick is an assistant editor of The New Republic and a Phillips  
Foundation Journalism Fellow. 


 
 
 
NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of NYP Holdings, Inc.  
nypost.com , nypostonline.com ,  and newyorkpost.com are trademarks of NYP 
Holdings, Inc.  
Copyright 2009 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. _Privacy_ 
(http://www.nypost.com/f/print/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/obama_wins_popularity_contes
ts_not_eaRSayJOdO1lmm0BIdca2O#)   | _Terms  of Use_ 
(http://www.nypost.com/f/print/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/obama_wins_popularity_contests_not_eaRSay
JOdO1lmm0BIdca2O#)  




_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to