Hrumph. I kinda thought some of the "Comments" were funny,
A few, not all, but some. But OK, no reason for me to gripe.
I had 3 or 4 good chuckles anyway.
 
Wilhelm
 
---------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/24/2009 7:34:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Well, I actually followed the "read more" and was  not impressed. The 
commentariat? There's trolls on all sides.  

David

  _   
 
"There  is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no 
virtue in  advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and 
"sensitive"  because he wants to expand the government's charitable programs is 
merely  saying that he's willing to try to do good with other people's 
money. Well,  who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting such 
programs 
is telling  us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a gun is held to 
his  head."--P. J.  O'Rourke



[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  
 
David :
I meant the entire schmeer, not just Klein.
 
Wilhelm
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
 
 
In a message dated 10/24/2009 1:25:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   writes:

Joe Klein is only more-or-less  left?? 

He shouldn't talk about sedition after the period from  2001-2008, when it 
was HE who was spouting it. The assumed moral and  intellectual superiority 
oozes and drips from this column like so much  slimy oil. 

>From a snake oil salesman, of course.  

David

  _   
 
"There  is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no 
virtue in  advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and  
"sensitive" because he wants to expand the government's charitable  programs is 
merely saying that he's willing to try to do good with other  people's 
money. Well, who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting  such 
programs 
is telling us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a  gun is held to 
his head."--P. J.  O'Rourke



[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   wrote:  
Time magazine
 
OutFoxed?
Posted by _Joe Klein_ (http://swampland.blogs.time.com/author/jklein1271/)  
 Friday, October 23, 2009 

 
 
Let me be precise here: Fox News peddles a fair amount of hateful  crap. 
Some of it borders on sedition. Much of it is flat out untrue. 
But I don't understand why the White House would give such poisonous  
helium balloons as Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity the opportunity for still  
greater 
spasms of self-inflation by _declaring war_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us/politics/23fox.html?hp)  on  Fox. 
If the problem is that stories bloated far beyond their actual  
importance--ACORN's corruption, Van Jones's radical past--are in danger  of 
leaching 
out of the Fox hothouse into the general media, then perhaps  the 
Administration should be a bit more diligent about whom it hires and  whom it 
funds. 
If the problem is broader--that Fox News spreads seditious lies to  its 
demographic sliver of an audience--the Administration should  probably be 
stoic: the wingnuts will always be with us. The best  antidote to their garbage 
is elegant, intelligent governance. The  next-best antidote is occasional 
engagement: I thought Obama came away  from his O'Reilly and Chris Wallace 
interviews much the better for it.  (Though you don't want to sit down with a 
thug like Hannity or a weirdo  like Beck.) 
The problem with war is that it diverts attention from the actual  news. 
The Administration has tried to pursue a sophisticated, difficult  domestic 
and foreign policy. It doesn't offer the quick-fix  irresponsibility of a tax 
cut or an invasion. It needs space, time and  patience to explain. This is 
an enervating, midstream moment. It's not  certain that the President's 
efforts from health care to Afghanistan  will succeed. We'll know a lot more in 
a 
month, but I really hope the  White House hasn't launched this attack to 
fill the public space while  the other issues are being sorted out. The 
long-term costs of stooping  to Fox's level are not just bad posture; they are 
a 
diminution of the  office and its primary occupant.



Read more: 
_http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/10/23/outfoxed/#ixzz0UrgAb3KN_ 
(http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/10/23/outfoxed/#ixzz0UrgAb3KN) 
 
COMMENTS :
 
The ACORN scandal is a lie? Van Jones is not a radical commie? I  think the 
anger at Fox News(THE most watch news network in America)  stems from fear, 
plain and simple. Truth just naturally has that certain  ring to it, and 
that has the WH very afraid. 
----------------------------
 
The reason Faux is "THE most watch [sic] news network in America" is  this: 
there is a significant benighted minority unwilling to let honest  
reporting interfere with their prejudices. 'Twas ever thus, and Faux is  their 
current refuge from the truth. 
I'm glad Faux is on the air – it tells me a lot about the  people 
who watch it. I always say let the Klan march down Main Street,  in the 
daylight sans masks, so we can see who they are. 
-----------------------------------


Aww man, there's that pesky fly again. 
----------------------------------
 
 
 
So what do call them trying to get rid of the insurance anti-trust  
exemption a week after they said the healthcare bill would drive up  insurance 
cost? What do you call them not wanting to let Fox News into  the press room 
yesterday until all the other reporters said they  wouldn't go in there either 
unless Fox was there? Fox is more balanced  than any of the other news 
organizations. Of course they have their  opinion shows, but so do the other 
networks(Keith Olbermann). When it  comes to straight reporting, Fox is the 
best 
at it.  
Do you remember the Pew Research poll that said Fox was the most  ballanced 
during the campaing doing the same number of positive and  negative stories 
for both guys(Obama 25% positive, 40% negative; McCain  22% positive, 40% 
negative). While MSNBC ran negative stories about  McCain 73% of the time and 
positive stories 10% of the time. MSNBC also  ran negative stories about 
Obama 14% of the time while running positive  stories 43% of the time.
_http://www.journalism.org/node/13437#_ 
(http://www.journalism.org/node/13437#)  
Fox isn't ultra right, they are just more balanced while the other  news 
groups are to the left 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
14.3
 
And FoxNews is "the people" how? It's a partisan news organization  owned 
by a very rich conservative (Murdoch) and run by a GOP operative.  (Ailes) 
News flash...they care about ratings because it makes them  money. They don't 
care about you. They don't care if the GOP remains out  of power for the 
next 50 years. The longer your gang is out of power,  the angrier you'll be, 
and you'll tune into FoxNews more and more as  your emotional outlet. You'll 
be putting money in Rupert and Roger's  pockets while your party sinks deeper 
and deeper into irrelevancy.  That's also what drives Rush. Sure, these 
folks are conservatives...but  their loyalty is to themselves and their bank 
accounts, not the  conservative movement and not the Republican Party. The 
stupidity of  today's GOP is evident in the fact that they continue to let 
themselves  get used like this.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Owned by a very rich conservative......? Is this the same Rupert  Murdoch 
who endorsed B.O and predicted he would win the election?  

---------------------------------------------------------- 
I see Fox the same way the White House sees Fox... as a harmful  entity 
that needs to be exposed for what they are, a network for the  very wealthy to 
spread lies and intolerance all to put more money into  the pockets of the 
richest Americans without caring about the damage it  is doing to the rest of 
us.  ........

--------------------------------------------------------------

What  in the world is there to expose about Fox? What lies do they tell? No 
 one here. No one. Has actually given any examples of anything they've  
aired that is untrue. ACORN? Truther Vanjones? That reporting was all  
accurate. What would Joe call Fox on? And as for Joe's comment: "Let me  be 
precise 
here: Fox News peddles a fair amount of hateful crap. Some of  it borders on 
sedition." Sedition? What about "dissent is the highest  form of 
patriotism?" Oh, that's right. That adage only applied when the  Evil Bush was 
in 
power. You libtards are so silly. You're desperate as  you see your "president" 
Barry 0bamao's polling numbers plummet, while  all of his signature issues 
go up in smoke. His first year is an epic  fail. In the latest Rasmussen 
poll, Republicans are beating Democrats in  10 out 10 issues important to the 
American people and twice as many  Americans call themselves conservatives as 
they do liberals....
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
There is one plain and simple truth being avoided in this discussion:  the 
Government NEVER gets to decide who covers it or how they go about  it, 
whether it is a credible news outlet or a partisan commentary  machine. To 
attempt to banish one of the five major broadcast media  outlets by asking the 
other four to join along is downright  unconstitutional. When the other four 
decline, and even themselves (ABC  News specifically) refer to Fox as "one of 
our sister organizations"  while questioning an administration 
spokesperson, that's all you need to  know about how far out of bounds the 
White House 
is on this  campaign. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
[ WH ] outrage would be more believable if you were discussing  sources of 
reckless reporting and not just FOX news. Your outrage seems  at best 
dishonest since you only attack what is determined by liberals  to be a right 
wing 
news organization. No mention of the misinformation  and out and out lies 
by CNN, MSNBC and NPR among others. In fact, there  have been mis-statements 
in your own articles. Does that make you  incompetent as well.?  
The righteous indignation of the left is laughable. You pretend to  take 
the high road with a false presumption of superior intelligence  when in fact 
they spend most of the time slandering and trying to  discredit anyone who 
disagrees.  
The Messiah in trying to slander FOX news as not a news organization  by 
pointing out 2 opinion shows. Is he misinformed, deliberately lying  or 
clueless.  
--------------------------------------------

29
 
.... if you're going to start a paragraph with "Let me be  precise," you 
should try to BE PRECISE. What borders on sedition  exactly? (And.. really? 
Didn't we learn from the Bush era about the  dangers of accusing people of 
treason for using their first amendment  right to free speech?) 
Fox puts some ridiculous non-stories on the air. They also do some  good 
reporting. Their opinion shows get a lot of stuff wrong. But they  are good at 
taking broad-based, imprecise statements like the ones you  make, and using 
them to their benefit: look! the liberal media is  calling us 'seditious' 
now! Critics need to actually take the time to  point out specific statements 
on Fox shows to back up  accusations.
---------------------------------------------------------

Let me be precise here: Fox News peddles a fair amount of hateful  crap. 
Some of it borders on sedition. Much of it is flat out  untrue. 

I'm confused Joe, you forgot to tell us which of the  "Much of it is flat 
out untrue." Did you mean all the information about  Van Jones? Was any of 
that untrue? How about the Acorn scandal? Was that  untrue?
Maybe the problem lies with the "On The Fringe" media who are  just too 
blind or too lazy to report anything but what Doctor Feelgood  wants reported.  
......................

-------------------------------------------------

Remember  when those Fox employees refused to read a Monsanto press release 
on air  because they knew it contained lies and were fired?
And remember how  Fox fought their wrongful termination lawsuit by 
successfully arguing  that it wasn't obligated to put out truthful "news" and 
could 
ask its  journalists to lie as a course of business? 
-----------------------------------------------

Yes slander Rush. And no your don't have to be President. The  "quotes" 
attributed to Rush by the left wing nut job media - that's  mainstream MSNBC 
and CNN to you, were slanderous.  
But to liberals that is ok. Makes your righteous indignation about  FOX 
comical. 
And let's not discuss who won't let who at rallies. Obama not only  hand 
picked the audience he wrote the questions. 
Still no runs no hits only errors. 
----------------------------- 

Let's put the Fox in proper perspective. Yes, it leads in CABLE  news 
numbers at around 2.8 mill in prime time. This is like leading the  farm club 
baseball league, and ignoring the majors. Last week, the  weakest network news, 
CBS, pulled in 5.9 mill. NBC did 7.1 and ABC  7.5.

---------------------------------- 
While you are correct about Prime Time we are talking 24/7 cable news  . 
How many are watching FOX while CBS has Survivor on at 8pm? Or during  soaps 
in the Afternoon. Or while Beck is on at 5PM drawing 3  Million? 
---------------------------------- 
 
I can probably find more lies in one Joe Klein article than an entire  week 
of Fox News reports. Sedition? Tell me one other US President who  
knowingly hired admitted communists into their administration other than  
Obama? 
Tell me Joe? Klein is part of the Left Wing Bolshevik Jewish  conspiracy to 
destroy this nation.
--------------------------- 
etc. etc . etc 




















 
____________________________________


_______________________________________________

Centroids mailing list: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 

_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com) 

Archives at 
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/) 



_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 
_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com) 
Archives  at 
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/) 

 
 
____________________________________


_______________________________________________

Centroids mailing list: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 

_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com) 

Archives at 
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/) 



_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


 
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to