Great ! I think we have hit the nail on the head between ourselves. Damn, I wish I had a blog up and running, this would go into the headline news / leading opinion section first thing in the morning. All the political / financial / professional etc reasons for the trial as opposed to all of the official BS and all the media BS. I kinda think the result would blow away everyone's little minds. thanks Billy ====================================== In a message dated 11/17/2009 7:09:42 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
Billy, I think this just might be another attempt of liberal American self-righteousness. The world knows we're after the kill but we pretend it's all about a "fair trial"...What about Pat's point. On one hand we try to kill them - no questions asked - and on the other we're trying to give them a "fair trial"? What's up with that? Also, as you put it "As for a fair trial, in this case, what would be wrong with a military tribunal?" Does the WH think that a tribunal would not be fair? Democrats have institutionalized the loathing of the American military. At one level I can see the angle of "they killed in NY, therefore they will be judged in NY", but is it really worth the risk and the circus to do this? Is this possibly one way to keep the "Bush legacy" alive for just a little bit longer? Can BHO win a 2nd term without running against Bush? // Lennart _______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
_______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
