Not real sure about the either/or approach. There's only 4 alternatives?

Where would they put Keynes? Hayek? Friedman?

David

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."—Neal Boortz

 



[email protected] wrote:
Ernie :
I like it. Needless to say, I'd also like to think about this and revise it,
but, yeah, very worthwhile approach.
 
Billy
=======================================================

I'm not yet sure how much I agree with them, but I love how they're approaching the problem...

http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/great-commission-utilitarianism-part-3/


=

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
 

_______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to