Re: [RC] Theology and Economics

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:44:26 -0800

Actually, the Libertarian web site uses a 4 corner model, they just tilt it. It is less simplistic than the standard left and right, but not by much.

Neither is this.

David

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."—Neal Boortz

 



[email protected] wrote:
Kevin :
O, you mean the Libertarian chart system.
No time for it now, but I wrote a detailed critique of that particular model.
Briefly, it is a splendid example of card stacking to emphasize how
Libertarians look at the world.
 
Up     = Good = Libertarian
Down = Bad  = what Libertarians most dislike
 
Cheap visual trick, in other words , hence the value in horizontal squares
where each square, up, down, Left or Right, is intended to be looked at objectively.
 
Billy
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
Anyway, the model under consideration is simply one of dozens of
alternative schemes.
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/7/2009 8:26:43 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
Right. A more accurate model would depict the corners as being the end-points of a two-dimensional continuum.

-Kevin

On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:37 PM, David R. Block wrote:

Not real sure about the either/or approach. There's only 4 alternatives?

Where would they put Keynes? Hayek? Friedman?

David

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."—Neal Boortz

 



[email protected] wrote:
Ernie :
I like it. Needless to say, I'd also like to think about this and revise it,
but, yeah, very worthwhile approach.
 
Billy
=======================================================

I'm not yet sure how much I agree with them, but I love how they're approaching the problem...

http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/great-commission-utilitarianism-part-3/
<Mail Attachment.jpeg>


=

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
 
 

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

=

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
 
 

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/




_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to